THE regulations for bovine Johnes disease (BJD) have proven to be a moving feast this year, with many in the industry remaining confused as to what it all means.
This is because the changes have been poorly communicated to producers. The new plan’s framework says “the new approach introduces a substantial shift in thinking: it requires some state (or territory) involvement that assists producers to manage endemic diseases such as BJD”. Given the mixed messages about how the new system works, it seems this “involvement” has not yet been adequate.
However, the changes – while still confusing for many – represent an acknowledgment of existing issues and an acceptance that eradication was not an option. Zone surveillance was high cost, as was the cost to individuals when their herds were quarantined and their markets restricted to slaughter only.
The old big brother lines on maps approach has been ditched in favour of a system which places the decision making into the hands of the producer. It is now their responsibility to provide the herd health information sought by the buyer, opening the door for market dynamics to drive adoption.
But are there clear benefits for individuals to adopt? The new national framework states alternative assurance tools that make participation worthwhile will be developed. However, with all the tools in the world, adoption will only be successful if it’s profitable, if producers understand how it works and have confidence in the tools.
If the diagnostic tests therefore aren’t improved to a level where producers have confidence in the results, then their use remains a risk that must be weighed up before adoption occurs. More funding for research and development in this area is therefore critical.
Meanwhile, for those who do detect the disease in their herd, the changes mean there are more options available. The increased flexibility around trading of stock should allow producers to manage their way out of a situation which previously would have had them condemned and selling direct to slaughter.
It has taken a long time for our governments to accept they have been on the wrong path. The first step has been made in a better direction. Producers now need the education and support that can help this be a success.
