Australia's Murray-Darling Basin Authority acted unlawfully and water allocations must undergo a complete overhaul across the system, a royal commission has found.
Subscribe now for unlimited access to all our agricultural news
across the nation
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
The commission report released on Thursday found river allotments were driven by politics and accused the basin authority board of maladministration over its disregard for science.
It said water levels must be made on a scientific basis and in accordance with reconstructed water laws.
It also wants uniform penalties between basin states for irrigators who don't comply with regulations.
The South Australia-based royal commission's 736-page final report includes 111 findings and 44 recommendations aimed at improving the effectiveness of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan.
The Murray-Darling Basin Authority acted unlawfully when it "completely ignored" climate change projections for the determination of water allocations, it said.
"The (sustainable diversion limit) ignores the best available scientific knowledge."
"As an administrative decision, it is indefensible."
South Australian Premier Steven Marshall said the commission had strayed from its initial aim.
The Liberal leader vowed to look at the legality of the plan and respond later in the year.
Mr Marshall will ask Prime Minister Scott Morrison to convene a meeting of the Basin states to look at the inquiry findings.
"I don't want to be drawn on providing commentary at this early stage," the premier told reporters in Adelaide.
"But I can assure every single person in this state, we are taking this royal commission report extraordinarily seriously."
He said the inquiry had not focused on allegations of water theft in the basin, despite his Labor predecessor promising it would.
READ MORE: MDB Royal Commission released to public
SA Water Minister David Spiers was disappointed with the commission's criticism of his actions, which were labelled a "capitulation" to the commonwealth contrary to the interests of the state.
"It is an isolated comment that doesn't consider all the other things that occurred," he said.
He said the government had got 450 gigalitres for the environment and $70 million for the Coorong river.
Australian Associated Press
