![Parties should support new laws Parties should support new laws](/images/transform/v1/crop/frm/39pvfYSLyNgcVbpppa8DQPd/4f1c92ee-2e04-4306-ac72-08ae8ab59113.JPG/r0_252_4928_3023_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg)
The dreadful Aussie Farms map created much anxiety for farming families, but it has also inspires much-needed strengthening of farm trespass laws.
Subscribe now for unlimited access to all our agricultural news
across the nation
or signup to continue reading
You rarely heard 'farm trespass' a few years ago.
Now it's common language used by the NSW and federal governments, as they set about giving families some protection from farm invasions.
With guidance from NSW Farmers and National Farmers Federation, both governments have taken steps to strengthen protection from these criminal activities that hinder our farmers legally producing food and fibre.
The federal government introduced the Criminal Code Amendment (Agricultural Protection) Bill, passed by the Senate on September 12.
This means tough new penalties for those who incite trespass, property damage or theft on agricultural land.
This law is about protecting farmers from groups or individuals that incite and encourage others to trespass.
This reform adequately recognises the criminal nature of these actions and ensures penalties reflect the significant stress caused to farming families, employees and animals.
This Bill is not about hindering press freedom or introducing 'ag gag' laws, as opponents claim.
It includes important protections for journalists and people disclosing lawful information.
The NSW government presented a bill to parliament on September 17 to strengthen the state's trespass laws and we ask parties to support it.
It would introduce new penalties of up to $22,000 to address the risks created by farm trespass.
Significantly, the Bill also introduces prison terms.
The Bill will complement the Commonwealth changes, as it also recognises the criminal activity of inciting trespass.
Farmers must be able to feel safe on their property and able to conduct their lawful business without interference.
They should not have to contend with trespass, harassment and intimidation, theft or damage to their property.
- JAMES JACKSON, president.